September 1, 2026 · 5 min read
Almost everyone asks this after reading about a settlement and thinking I think I bought that. The good news is that it is a checkable question, not a matter of opinion, and the check takes about two minutes.
Every settlement has a class definition and a class period. Together they are the entire test.
Class definition: who it covers. It reads like this:
"All persons in Canada who purchased [product] for personal use…"
Class period: when. Usually attached to the same sentence:
"…between March 1, 2019 and July 8, 2024."
Right product, wrong dates: not in the class. Right dates, but you bought it for resale when the definition says personal use: not in the class. It really is that mechanical, which is why the administrator can decide claims at scale.
Both sentences live on the administrator's official settlement page, near the top, usually under a heading like "Who is included". If a page talks about a settlement but never states these two things, you are not on the administrator's page: here is how to tell the difference.
Notice is a rule about how a settlement must be publicised. It is not a list of who qualifies, and it fails routinely:
| How you were "notified" | Why it missed you |
|---|---|
| Email to the address on file | You changed it in 2020, or it went to spam looking exactly like the phishing it resembles. |
| Letter to your mailing address | You moved. |
| Newspaper and website notice | Used when the company has no way to reach cash customers at all. Legally sufficient, practically invisible. |
| Nothing | Common for ordinary retail purchases. There was never a record connecting you to the product. |
You are in the class based on what you did, not on what arrived in your inbox.
Normal, and usually solvable. Places your own records survive:
Bank and credit card statements (most banks keep several years online), order confirmation emails (searching your inbox for the retailer's name is faster than scrolling), purchase history inside a retailer or marketplace account, and loyalty or rewards account history.
Before you give up over a missing receipt: a large share of settlements have a tier that needs no proof of purchase at all. You attest to what you bought and receive a smaller flat amount; documentation only unlocks the higher tier. Check the claim form for the no-documentation option before assuming you are out.
There is nothing to have bought. A breach settlement usually defines the class as people whose information was held in the compromised system during a stated period, so the question is whether you had an account, not whether you spent money.
Administrators for breach settlements often provide a lookup that checks your details against the notice list, and these settlements commonly pay a flat amount with no documentation, plus a higher tier if you can document losses or time spent dealing with fraud.
Then the honest answer is that the administrator decides, and that is not a dodge. It is how the process is built. Nobody else has the authority, which is why no legitimate page will tell you that you qualify.
One thing to be clear about: a claim form is a signed statement about your own purchase, account or loss. If you meet the definition and are unsure about the details, filing and letting the administrator assess it is the ordinary course. Attesting to a purchase you did not make is not a grey area, and it is also the behaviour that makes administrators demand documentation from everyone next time.
Reading the class definition works when you already know a settlement exists. The harder problem is the settlements you have never heard of, which is most of them, and the ones with the deadline closing this month.
See every settlement currently open in Canada and the US →
PayUpBro checks each one against its administrator before listing it, shows the real court-set deadline, and drops anything that has closed. What it cannot do, and what nobody outside the administrator can do, is tell you that you qualify.
PayUpBro is not a law firm and never files a claim for you. This page explains how to read publicly available settlement notices; it is not legal advice. Whether you qualify is decided by the court-appointed settlement administrator, not by us.